高级检索+
胡金龙, 罗楠, 樊亚明. 基于土地利用变化的漓江上游生态风险时空分异[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2017, 37(2): 88-94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.02.014
引用本文: 胡金龙, 罗楠, 樊亚明. 基于土地利用变化的漓江上游生态风险时空分异[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2017, 37(2): 88-94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.02.014
HU Jin-long, LUO Nan, FAN Ya-ming. Spatiotemporal Variation of Ecological Risk in Upper Reaches of Lijiang River by LandUse Change[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 37(2): 88-94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.02.014
Citation: HU Jin-long, LUO Nan, FAN Ya-ming. Spatiotemporal Variation of Ecological Risk in Upper Reaches of Lijiang River by LandUse Change[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 37(2): 88-94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.02.014

基于土地利用变化的漓江上游生态风险时空分异

Spatiotemporal Variation of Ecological Risk in Upper Reaches of Lijiang River by LandUse Change

  • 摘要: 根据漓江上游1986,2000,2013 年三期Landsat 遥感影像,提取土地利用数据,构建生态风险指数,借助空间自相关分析等方法,研究漓江上游生态风险时空演化特征。结果表明,1986-2013 年,漓江上游土地利用变化显著,林地面积持续增加,耕地面积不断减少,建设用地快速扩张,用地类型主要向林地和建设用地转移;27年间漓江上游生态风险维持在较低水平,并呈持续下降趋势,空间分布上存在显著的正自相关性,生态风险高值区聚集在漓江上游的城镇区域,低值区主要分布在北部和西部的山林地带;漓江上游以低和较低生态风险区为主,面积逐年增加,较高和中生态风险区减少,高生态风险区很小但扩张迅速;生态风险空间分布整体格局基本稳定,呈南高北低,中间高两侧低,高风险区沿漓江两岸零散分布的格局特点。

     

    Abstract: Based on remote sensing images of upper reaches of Lijiang River, Guangxi, in 1986, 2000 and 2013, the land-use data were extracted andecological risk index was constructed. The characteristics of spatiotemporal variation of ecological risk were analyzed by spatial autocorrelation. Theresults showed that land use changed significantly from 1986 to 2013 in upper reaches of Lijiang River. Woodland and construction land increasedwhile farmland decreased. Ecological risk kept at a low level and decreased continuously in the research area. The spatial distribution of ecologicalrisk showed significant positive autocorrelation. Cities and towns had higher ecological risk along Lijiang River, mountain and forest in the northernand western of the research area had lower risk. The research demonstrated that ecological risk was low in upper reaches of Lijiang River, withincrease of areas, and small area has high ecological risk but increased quickly.

     

/

返回文章
返回