F2型和APF-1持久型引诱剂对松墨天牛的林间诱捕效果比较

张冬勇; 席璐璐; 余峰; 吴利平; 徐俊; 刘晓明

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2018.06.013

F2型和APF-1持久型引诱剂对松墨天牛的林间诱捕效果比较

Comparisons on Field Trapping Effect of F2 and APF-1 onMonochamusalternatus

摘要

摘要: 2016年7月8日至9月7日，分别在杭州市富阳区洞桥镇和新登镇2个马尾松Pinusmassoniana林样地，以F2型、APF-1持久型2种引诱剂为研究对象对松墨天牛Monochamusalternatus进行林间诱捕效果试验。结果表明，在洞桥样地，F2型引诱剂的周平均诱捕天牛量为101.78头，而APF-1持久型引诱剂为69.78头，F2型引诱剂的诱捕效果对比APF-1持久型引诱剂诱捕效果高出45.86%，差异性显著（P< 0.05）；在新登样地，F2型引诱剂的周平均诱捕天牛量为26.50头，而APF-1持久型引诱剂为20.88头，F2型引诱剂诱捕效果对比APF-1持久型引诱剂诱捕效果提高26.95%，差异性显著（P< 0.05）。APF-1持久型引诱剂每30 d更换1次，而F2型引诱剂每45 d更换1次，使用F2型引诱剂可以节约更换诱芯的人工成本。因此，无论是在高效性和持效性上，F2型引诱剂都要优于APF-1持久型引诱剂，高效持久的引诱剂对于监测和防治松墨天牛种群，以及防控松材线虫病的传播蔓延都具有重要的意义。

Abstract: Field experiments were conducted on trapping ofMonochamusalternatus by F2 attractant and APF-1 persistent attractant at Pinusmassonianaforest in Dongqiao and Xindengtown of Fuyang, Zhejiang province during July 8th to September 7th of 2016. The results showed that101.78M. alternatusweremeanly trappedby F2 every week atDongqiao, while 69.78 ones by APF-1. The effect of F2 was 45.86% higher than that of APF-1 with significantdifference. 26.5 M. alternatusweremeanly trappedby F2 every week atXindeng, while 20.88 ones by APF-1. The effect of F2 was 26.95% higher than that of APF-1 with significantdifference. The APF-1 persistent attractant should bereplaced once a month, while F2 attractant once a month and half with cost and labor saving the cost of replacing the attractant.

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

施引文献

资源附件(0)