高级检索+
黄欣宇 , 黄春晖, 聂锦燕, 叶锦培, 邓文军, 蒋维昕. 马尾松-湿加松混交林与马尾松纯林生长量及林下植被特征分析[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2022, 42(4): 30-36. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2022.04.005
引用本文: 黄欣宇 , 黄春晖, 聂锦燕, 叶锦培, 邓文军, 蒋维昕. 马尾松-湿加松混交林与马尾松纯林生长量及林下植被特征分析[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2022, 42(4): 30-36. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2022.04.005
HUANG Xin-yu, HUANG Chun-hui, NIE Jin-yan, YE Jin-pei, DENG Wen-jun, JIANG Wei-xin. Growth and Understory Vegetation Characters of Mixed Plantation of Pinus massoniana and P. elliottii × caribaea and Pure P. massoniana Plantation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 42(4): 30-36. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2022.04.005
Citation: HUANG Xin-yu, HUANG Chun-hui, NIE Jin-yan, YE Jin-pei, DENG Wen-jun, JIANG Wei-xin. Growth and Understory Vegetation Characters of Mixed Plantation of Pinus massoniana and P. elliottii × caribaea and Pure P. massoniana Plantation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 42(4): 30-36. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2022.04.005

马尾松-湿加松混交林与马尾松纯林生长量及林下植被特征分析

Growth and Understory Vegetation Characters of Mixed Plantation of Pinus massoniana and P. elliottii × caribaea and Pure P. massoniana Plantation

  • 摘要: 对苍梧县国有天洪岭林场12 年生马尾松Pinus massoniana(桐棉种源)-湿加松P. elliottii ×P. caribaea 人 工混交林及桐棉种源、土贡种源马尾松人工纯林进行调查分析,研究种源、林分类型对林木生长量以林下植被特 征的影响。结果表明:马尾松-湿加松混交林的树高生长量显著高于桐棉种源、土贡种源马尾松纯林(P < 0.05); 马尾松-湿加松混交林中树木的平均胸径(14.96 cm)与土贡种源马尾松纯林(15.06 cm)相当,但显著低于桐棉 种源马尾松纯林(15.90 cm)(P < 0.05);马尾松-湿加松混交林与桐棉种源马尾松纯林在单株材积上无显著差异 (P ? 0.05),但优于土贡种源(P < 0.05);马尾松-湿加松混交林内马尾松的生长显著优于湿加松;从多样性指 标均值看,混交林灌木层植被的多样性较纯林高。综上,营建马尾松-湿加松混交林在林分生长及林下植被多样性 维持方面均优于马尾松纯林,且桐棉种源马尾松相对土贡种源马尾松及湿加松均具有显著生长优势。本研究结果 为马尾松人工林的经营提供了一定参考。

     

    Abstract: In March 2006, 1-year bare-root seedlings of different provenances of Pinus massoniana and P. elliottii × caribaea were planted under three group on the same slope in State-owned Tianhongling Forest Farm, Cangwu, Guangxi. Stand of pure P. massoniana (Tongmian provenance, TM), pure P. massoniana (Tugong provenance, TG), mixed TM and P. elliottii × caribaea (MIX) formed 3 groups. In 2018, quadrat investigations showed that height growth of MIX was significantly higher than that of two pure stands (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference of individual tree volume between MIX and TM, but obviously higher than that of TG. Growth of P. massoniana was better than that of P. elliottii × caribaea in the MIX. Shrub layer diversity under MIX had higher values than that under pure stands.

     

/

返回文章
返回