高级检索+
李娟, 滕士元, 史骥清, 曹森, 周志春. 基于SSR分子标记的水松和墨西哥落羽杉疑似杂交种鉴定[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2024, 44(4): 28-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.04.005
引用本文: 李娟, 滕士元, 史骥清, 曹森, 周志春. 基于SSR分子标记的水松和墨西哥落羽杉疑似杂交种鉴定[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2024, 44(4): 28-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.04.005
LI Juan, TENG Shiyuan, SHI Jiqing, CAO Sen, ZHOU Zhichun. Identification of Putative Hybrids between Glyptostrobus pensilis and Taxodium mucronatum[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2024, 44(4): 28-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.04.005
Citation: LI Juan, TENG Shiyuan, SHI Jiqing, CAO Sen, ZHOU Zhichun. Identification of Putative Hybrids between Glyptostrobus pensilis and Taxodium mucronatum[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2024, 44(4): 28-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.04.005

基于SSR分子标记的水松和墨西哥落羽杉疑似杂交种鉴定

Identification of Putative Hybrids between Glyptostrobus pensilis and Taxodium mucronatum

  • 摘要: 在吴江市苗圃集团有限公司国家耐水湿树种良种基地发现了较多水松Glyptostrobus pensilis和墨西哥落羽杉Taxodium mucronatum的疑似天然杂交种植株,其生长势均较水松强,抗性强,树形更加优美,很具开发价值。本研究分别利用水松和墨西哥落羽杉的SSR引物对12个水松和墨西哥落羽杉疑似杂交种进行鉴定。结果显示,开发得到重复性和特异性良好的水松引物7对和墨西哥落羽杉引物13对;用特异性引物鉴定出S1507、S1509、S1513、S1517、S1520、S1523、S1527、S201701和S202015均为水松和墨西哥落羽杉的杂交种,M1405和M1430为墨西哥落羽杉纯种,而S1504可能既不是水松或墨西哥落羽杉纯种,也不是两者的杂交种。研究结果可靠地鉴定了12个疑似杂交种,证实了水松和墨西哥落羽杉能进行杂交,为两者的杂交育种奠定了理论基础,为后续杂交种的繁育和生产提供了母本材料,也为水松和墨西哥落羽杉疑似杂交种鉴定提供了稳定的SSR分子标记。

     

    Abstract: A considerable number of putative natural hybrids between G. pensilis and T. mucronatum were discovered in the National Water-Tolerant and Moisture-Tolerant Tree Species Elite Germplasm Base of Wujiang Nursery Group Co., Ltd. These hybrid plants exhibited superior growth vigor, increased resistance, enhanced tree form, and great potential for development. This study employed SSR primers derived from Glyptostrobus pensilis and Taxodium mucronatum to identify 12 putative hybrids between these two species. The results revealed that a set of 7 primers from G. pensilis, as well as 13 primers from T. mucronatum, exhibited good repeatability and specificity. By using of these selected specific primers, hybrids S1507, S1509, S1513, S1517, S1520, S1523, S1527, S201701 and S202015 were identified as hybrids between G. pensilis and T. mucronatum. Meanwhile, M1405 and M1430 were identified as pure T. mucronatum, while S1504 was determined to be a non-hybrid, not belonging to either G. pensilis or T. mucronatum. The reliable identification of the 12 putative hybrids in this study confirms the crossability between G. pensilis and T. mucronatum, establishing a theoretical foundation for their hybrid breeding. This research provides parental materials for the subsequent breeding and production of hybrids and offers stable SSR molecular markers for the identification of hybrids between G. pensilis and T. mucronatum.

     

/

返回文章
返回