Advanced Search+
ZOU Yi-qiao, YING Bao-gen, CAI Ren-yue, CHEN Zi-jian, YAO Ren-tu, GE Hong-li. Structural Estimation onAnnual Net Productivity of Tree Layer by Data fromPermanent Sample Plots in Tiantai[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 39(3): 23-31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2019.03.004
Citation: ZOU Yi-qiao, YING Bao-gen, CAI Ren-yue, CHEN Zi-jian, YAO Ren-tu, GE Hong-li. Structural Estimation onAnnual Net Productivity of Tree Layer by Data fromPermanent Sample Plots in Tiantai[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 39(3): 23-31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2019.03.004

Structural Estimation onAnnual Net Productivity of Tree Layer by Data fromPermanent Sample Plots in Tiantai

More Information
  • Received Date: January 02, 2019
  • Revised Date: April 10, 2019
  • Mean annual growth rate of biomass of reserved tree, mean annual retention rate of biomass, mean annual growth rate ofingrowth-treeand mean annual number of ingrowth-tree per unit area was structurally estimated by using the permanent sample plot dataduring 2009-2014, 2014-2016 and 2016-2017 of Tiantaicounty, Zhejiang province, with different forest types, tree species groups and age groups.The result showed that mean annual growth rate of biomass of each reserved tree species group decreased with the increase of age group.The average annual growth rate of reserved tree biomass in commercial forest was higher than that in ecological forest.The mean annual retention rate of biomassof all tree species groups in ecological forest was lower than that in commercial forest.The mean annual growth rate ofingrowth-tree biomass of tree species in ecological forest was higher than that in commercial forest except hard broad I.With the increase of age group, the number of ingrowth-tree per unit area decreased.Under any age group, the annual number of ingrowth-tree per unit area inecological forest was higher than that in commercial forest.
  • [1]
    孟宪宇.测树学[M].中国林业出版社,2006,193,298.
    [2]
    徐永兴.杉木-深山含笑混交林及其纯林乔木层的净生产力研究[J].浙江林业科技,2017,37(01):47-50.
    [3]
    项文化,田大伦,闫文德.森林生物量与生产力研究综述[J].中南林业调查规划,2003(03):57-60,64.
    [4]
    国家林业局.森林生态系统服务功能评估规范:LY/T 1721-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
    [5]
    惠刚盈,王宏翔.关于森林生态系统服务功能评价的思考[J].温带林业研究,2018,1(03):5-9.
    [6]
    HASENAUERH,PETRITSCHR,ZHAOMS,et al.Reconciling satellite with ground data to estimate forest productivity at national scales[J].For EcolManag,2012,276:198-208.
    [7]
    MACHWITZM,GESSNERU,CONRADC,et al.Modelling the Gross Primary Productivity of West Africa with the Regional Biomass Model RBM, using optimized 250m MODIS FPAR and fractional vegetation cover information[J].Int J App Earth ObservGeoinform,2015,43:177-194.
    [8]
    朱文泉,潘耀忠,张锦水.中国陆地植被净初级生产力遥感估算[J].植物生态学报,2007(03):413-424.
    [9]
    沃笑,吴良才,张继平,等.基于CASA模型的三江源地区植被净初级生产力遥感估算研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(09):45-50.
    [10]
    BROWN S L,SCHROEDER P,KERN J S.Spatial distribution of biomassin forests of the eastern USA[J].For EcolManag,1999,123:81-90.
    [11]
    刘国华,傅伯杰,方精云.中国森林碳动态及其对全球碳平衡的贡献[J].生态学报,2000,20(5):733-740.
    [12]
    ZHAOM,ZHOUGS.Estimation of biomass and net primary productivity of major planted forests in China based on forest inventory data[J].For EcolManag,2005,207(3):0-313.
    [13]
    李福强,王兴华,陈士刚,等.吉林市森林固碳释氧生态效益评价[J].吉林林业科技,2011,40(02):10-12,43.
    [14]
    ZHOUGS,WANGYH,JIANGYL,et al.Estimating biomass and net primary production from forest inventory data: a case study of China’s Larix forests[J].For EcolManag,2002,169(1):149-157.
    [15]
    张茂震,王广兴,刘安兴.基于森林资源连续清查资料估算的浙江省森林生物量及生产力[J].林业科学,2009,45(09):13-17.
    [16]
    季碧勇,陶吉兴,张国江,等.林分生长率非线性混合模型的构建[J].西南林业大学报,2017,37(01):149-158.
    [17]
    管杰然,伊力塔,郑超超,等.浙江天台公益林生物量及涵养水源效益研究[J].福建林业科技,2016,43(04):27-33.
    [18]
    陶吉兴.浙江森林碳汇功能监测[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014:290-292.
    [19]
    袁位高,江波,葛永金,等.浙江省重点公益林生物量模型研究[J].浙江林业科技,2009,29(02):1-5.
    [20]
    吴雨峰,葛宏立,邹奕巧.基于抽样固定样地的总体进界木株数模型研建[J].林业资源管理,2015(01):38-43.
    [21]
    张豪杰,朱巍巍,王思娜,等.仙居县主要树种蓄积量生长率研究[J].现代农业科技,2018(15):165-166,170.
    [22]
    季碧勇,陶吉兴,张国江,等.高精度保证下的浙江省森林植被生物量评估[J].浙江农林大学学报,2012,29(03):328-334.

Catalog

    Article views (893) PDF downloads (487) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return