| Citation: |
GAO Meirong, HUANG Xubo, LI Hepeng, JIANG Bo, ZHANG Xiaomian, YUE Chunlei, WU Weizhi, GU Xiaobo, WANG Weiyu, WANG Xiuyun. Ecological Security Evaluation and Ecological Restoration Research of Hickory Forest in Lin’an District[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2024, 44(6): 80-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.06.011
|
The excessive use of land by human activities worsens the environment in ecologically fragile areas, which has become an important factor affecting and restricting China’s economic and social development.
Strengthening the protection and restoration of degraded ecosystems in fragile areas is an important way to solve the current problems between ecological environment and economic development. Based on ecological security and the theory of restoration ecology, taking Lin’an Hickory nut producing area as the research object, which has been seriously ecological degraded and caused geological disasters. this paper systematically analyzed the effect and results of the ecological degradation of natural factors such as the ecological location, geological structure, soil erosion and rainfall, as well as human factors such as weeding and garden clearing, excessive use of pesticides, and excessive fertilization in Lin’an Hickory nut producing area, and the process and formation mechanism of ecological degradation were analyzed, evaluated Hickory forest ecological security state.
The studies have shown that it is The combined effect of natural and human factors has led to the ecological degradation of the production area. On this basis, by constructing the ecological sensitivity evaluation index system, and conducting comprehensive sensitivity assessment, key areas for ecological restoration have been identified, and ideas for ecological space management and control and zoning policies have been innovatively put forward. Returning fruits to forests, ecological management, restoration of degraded ecological paths, and technical measures to improve quality and efficiency in economic forest production areas.
As the largest producing area of hickory in China, its ecological restoration model can provide reference for restoring damaged ecological environment and ensuring ecological safety in other areas of the same type.
| [1] |
蒋艳灵,刘春腊,周长青,等. 中国生态城市理论研究现状与实践问题思考[J]. 地理研究,2015,34(12):2222 − 2237.
|
| [2] |
叶鑫,邹长新,刘国华,等. 生态安全格局研究的主要内容与进展[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(10):3382 − 3392.
|
| [3] |
肖笃宁,陈文波,郭福良. 论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容[J]. 应用生态学报,2002,13(3):354 − 358. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2002.03.024
|
| [4] |
彭建,赵会娟,刘焱序,等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(3):407 − 419.
|
| [5] |
STEFFEN W,RICHARDSON K,ROCKSTROM J,et al. Planetary boundaries:guiding human development on a changing planet[J]. Science,2015,347(6223):1259855. doi: 10.1126/science.1259855
|
| [6] |
WU J G. Urban ecology and sustainability:The state-of-the-science and future directions[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2014,125(2):209 − 221.
|
| [7] |
崔胜辉,洪华生,黄云凤,等. 生态安全研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2005,38(10):3382 − 3392.
|
| [8] |
王聪,伍星,傅伯杰,等. 重点脆弱生态区生态恢复模式现状与发展方向[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(20):7333 − 7343.
|
| [9] |
王晗生,刘国彬. 植被结构及其防治土壤侵蚀作用分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,1999,13(2):62 − 68.
|
| [10] |
李传文. 森林保持水土涵养水源的效应及评价[J]. 山西水土保持科技,2006(2):1 − 3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0120.2006.02.001
|
| [11] |
张萍,曾信波. 植被蓄水保土功能研究[J]. 山地农业生物学报,1999(5):300 − 304.
|
| [12] |
吴钦孝,赵鸿雁,刘向东,等. 森林枯枝落叶层涵养水源保持水土的作用评价[J]. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998,4(2):23 − 28.
|
| [13] |
戴晓勇,裴家模,罗魏,等. 不同森林类型枯落物持水特性研究[J]. 贵州林业科技,2008,36(4):32 − 34.
|
| [14] |
赵秀芬,李俊良. 长期使用单一肥料对土壤质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学,2009,37(25):12060 − 12062. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2009.25.101
|
| [15] |
杨果,张英鹏,魏建林,等. 长期使用化肥对山东三大土类土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2007,23(12):244 − 250. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.12.054
|
| [16] |
张璐璐,贾桂民,叶建丰,等. 浙江临安山核桃干腐病发生发展规律[J]. 浙江农林大学学报,2013,30(1):148 − 152.
|
| [17] |
刘锦,于炜. 山核桃干腐病研究进展[J]. 浙江林业科技,2017,37(6):99 − 102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.06.018
|
| [18] |
钱颖,杨建军. 基于生态敏感性和景观格局的城市生态带规划探究[J]. 中国园林,2014(6):107 − 111.
|
| [19] |
战明松,朱京海. 基于生态敏感性评价的本溪青云山景区空间规划[J]. 应用生态学报,2019,30(7):2352 − 2360.
|
| [20] |
李宗尧,杨桂山,董雅文. 经济快速发展地区生态安全格局的构建:以安徽沿江地区为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2007,22(1):106 − 113. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2007.01.013
|
| [21] |
丁振民,姚顺波. 区域生态敏感性评估的理论框架与模型设计—以陕西省为例[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(8):2085 − 2098. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181415
|
| [22] |
王浩,马星,杜勇. 基于生态系统服务重要性和生态敏感性的广东省生态安全格局构建[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(5):1705 − 1715.
|
| [23] |
吴金华,李纪伟,朱鸿儒. 基于ArcGIS区统计的延安市土地生态敏感性评价[J]. 自然资源学报,2011,26(7):1180 − 1188. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.07.010
|
| [24] |
何舸. 山水园林城市生态空间规划研究—以南宁市为例[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(18):7406 − 7416.
|
| [25] |
倪庆琳,侯湖平,丁忠义,等. 基于生态安全格局识别的国土空间生态修复分区—以徐州市贾汪区为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(1):204 − 216.
|
| [26] |
付凤杰,刘珍环,刘海. 基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态修复关键区域识别—以贺州市为例[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(9):3406 − 3414.
|
| [1] | ZHANG Shengti, ZHU Chaobo, NI Rongxin, WANG Jinrong, HONG Lixing. Evaluation Study on the Community Structure of Ecological Restoration for Highway Slope Greening and Afforestation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2024, 44(5): 45-51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.05.006 |
| [2] | LI Hongjun, ZHENG Peng, GAO Haili, LIAO Tangqing, WU Shufang, ZHANG Bo, LIAN Huiwen. Analysis on Ecosystem Service Importance and Eco-environmental Sensitivity of Ecological Forest in Chun’an[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2023, 43(5): 77-85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2023.05.010 |
| [3] | YAO Feng-ping, LI He-peng, WU Yi-qing, ZHANG Fei-ying, BAI Ming-e, NI Rong-xin, XU Gao-fu, ZHANG Jian-he. Research Progress on Ecological Environment and Phytoremediation in Lead-zinc Mining Areas[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 42(3): 101-111. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2022.03.018 |
| [4] | GUO Qing, WANG Min-ying, WANG Chen-ye. Progress on Ecological Compensation Standard Estimation of River Basins[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 42(2): 84-89. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2022.02.014 |
| [5] | ZHU Bing-kun, DENG Hai-yan, HUANG Hua-rong, ZHONG Dong-ming. Analysis on Strategy for Forest Ecological Security in China by SWOT[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 42(1): 111-116. |
| [6] | ZENG Chun-xing, CHEN Feng-rong, SHAO Hua-liang. Empirical Research on Socialized Management of Ecological Forest in Jiangshan City[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2020, 40(5): 70-76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2020.05.013 |
| [7] | WU Jing-sheng, WANG Xiao-li, ZHU Nan, PENG Yang-he, PAN Jiang-ling. Current Situation and Countermeasures of Ecological Forest Compensation System in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2020, 40(3): 79-84. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2020.03.014 |
| [8] | WANG Min-ying, WANG Chen-ye, WU Xiao-chen, HU Xiao-fei, YANG Xiao-shu. Current Situation and Countermeasures of Ecological Compensation in Hainan Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2020, 40(1): 96-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2020.01.016 |
| [9] | LI Hong-jun, GAO Hai-li, ZHOU Wei-qing, XIANG Xin-nian, XU Jian-qing, XU Gao-fu. Study on Decomposition of Litter and Carbon Dynamics of Major Tree Species in Ecological Forest of Qiandao Lake[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 39(6): 38-44. |
| [10] | ZHOU Fei-fei. Assessment of Eco-tourism Impact on Landscape Ecology in Zhangjiajie Nature Reserves in Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2018, 38(2): 21-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2018.02.004 |
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: