| Citation: |
WANG Tongying, XU Lin. Carbon Footprint and Carbon Emission Reduction Analysis of Two Typical Bamboo Flooring Types[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2025, 45(1): 33-40. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2025.01.004
|
Based on the calculation of the life cycle carbon footprint of two kinds of bamboo products, recombinant bamboo flooring and ordinary bamboo flooring, this paper analyzed the carbon emission reduction potential. The results showed that the carbon footprints of ordinary bamboo flooring and recombinant bamboo flooring were 30.722 8 and −70.385 7 kg CO2 -eq·m−3, respectively. The main carbon emission link of reconstituted bamboo flooring was the carbon emission of the processing process, which contributed 66.0% to the carbon footprint. The main emission link for ordinary bamboo flooring was the carbon emissions from accessories, which contributed 65.0% to the carbon footprint. The contribution of carbon emissions from transport to the carbon footprint of both types of bambo o flooring was low, within 7%. Under different emission reduction scenarios, the recombinant bamboo flooring had the largest carbon emission reduction under scenario 5 （setting the transport distance at 24 km and increasing the production efficiency by 15%）, with a carbon footprint of −104.658 0 kg CO2 -eq·m−3 after emission reduction; ordinary bamboo flooring had the largest carbon emission reduction under scenario 6 （24km transport distance, 15% increase in production efficiency and 20% reduction in the use of additives）, with a carbon footprint of −5.761 1 kg CO2 -eq·m−3. The above study could be used as a reference to determine the direction of emission reduction for bamboo enterprises.
| [1] |
李玉敏,冯鹏飞. 基于第九次全国森林资源清查的中国竹资源分析[J]. 世界竹藤通讯,2019,17(6):45 − 48.
|
| [2] |
傅兴. 中国竹浆造纸的潜力与发展[J]. 世界竹藤通讯,2022,20(1):54 − 57.
|
| [3] |
费本华,漆良华. 实施我国国家竹材储备战略计划的思考[J]. 世界林业研究,2020,33(3):38 − 42.
|
| [4] |
李岚,朱霖,朱平. 中国竹资源及竹产业发展现状分析[J]. 南方农业,2017,11(1):6 − 9.
|
| [5] |
中国林产工业协会. 2022年我国地板行业销量概况[J]. 中国人造板,2023,30(5):32.
|
| [6] |
洪城辉. 竹地板产品的优势及其发展思路[J]. 市场监管与质量技术研究,2023(2):42 − 45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5981.2023.02.012
|
| [7] |
唐荣强,方崇荣,徐漫平,等. 户外重组竹地板耐水性和耐光老化性研究[J]. 林产工业,2022,59(7):19 − 23,29.
|
| [8] |
王一鸣,木其坚. 全球碳关税变局的驱动因素、相关影响与应对[J]. 宏观经济管理,2022(5):15 − 23.
|
| [9] |
ASIOLI D,ZHOU X,HALMEMIES-BEAUCHET-FILLEAU A,et al. Consumers’ valuation for low-carbon emission and low-saturated fat butter[J]. Food Quality and Preference,2023,108:104859. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104859
|
| [10] |
NAGAI K,HATA S,ITSUBO N,et al. Carbon footprints by stage of chronic kidney disease:the case of Japan[J]. The Journal of Climate Change and Health,2023:100294.
|
| [11] |
WANG Z R,WU Q H. Carbon emission reduction and product collection decisions in the closed-loop supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2020,59(14):4359 − 4383.
|
| [12] |
龙超,王光玉,鲁德,等. 竹产品生命周期中碳足迹研究[J]. 世界林业研究,2023,36(3):22 − 27.
|
| [13] |
周国模,顾蕾,柴庆辉,等. 竹产品碳足迹碳标签——推动中国竹产业创新发展的利器[J]. 世界竹藤通讯,2022,20(6):8 − 11,29.
|
| [14] |
钱圆. 竹产业发展的浙江经验[J]. 四川省情,2022(7):25 − 27.
|
| [15] |
孟海月. 毛竹伐后加工利用状况与竹制品固碳能力分析[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学,2014.
|
| [16] |
张旭. “双碳”目标下炼化企业转型发展思考与对策分析[J]. 现代化工,2022,42(4):1 − 6.
|
| [17] |
马海波,朱强. 碳中和目标下夜市鸡排碳足迹分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(1):41 − 47.
|
| [18] |
CLUNE S,CROSSIN E,VERGHESE K. Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,140:766 − 783. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.082
|
| [19] |
许培玉,朱建君,徐霄枭,等. 竹建筑材料全生命周期碳足迹测算及碳汇优势研究[J]. 人民长江,2023,54(5):88 − 93.
|
| [20] |
PELLENGAHR F,GHANNADZADEH A,VAN DER MEER Y. How accurate is plastic end-of-life modeling in LCA? Investigating the main assumptions and deviations for the end-of-life management of plastic packaging[J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption,2023,42:170 − 182. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2023.09.014
|
| [21] |
周鹏飞. 碳足迹评估对竹产品企业的潜在影响及策略选择[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学,2015.
|
| [22] |
ZHANG J,WANG Z,WANG J,et al. Total synthesis and structural modification of the dibenzylbutane lignan LCA as a potent anti-inflammatory agent against LPS-induced acute lung injury[J]. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry,2024,268:116272. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116272
|
| [23] |
惠博文,刘锐,李健,等. 生命周期视角下食品碳足迹的评估及案例分析[J]. 食品科学,2022,43(7):381 − 390.
|
| [24] |
FALCONE G,FAZARI A,VONO G,et al. Application of the LCA approach to the citrus production chain – A systematic review[J]. Cleaner Environmental Systems,2024,12:100156. doi: 10.1016/j.cesys.2023.100156
|
| [25] |
刘红梅. 食品生命周期碳足迹评价研究[J]. 荆楚理工学院学报,2012,27(9):13 − 16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-4657.2012.09.003
|
| [26] |
秦于茜. 水泥产品碳足迹核算研究[D]. 西安:西安理工大学,2020.
|
| [27] |
王来力,丁雪梅,吴雄英. 纺织产品碳足迹研究进展[J]. 纺织学报,2013,34(6):113 − 119. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9721.2013.06.022
|
| [28] |
孙锌,刘晶茹,杨东,等. 家用空调碳足迹及其关键影响因素分析[J]. 环境科学学报,2014,34(4):1054 − 1060.
|
| [29] |
田彬彬,徐向阳,付鸿娟,等. 基于生命周期的产品碳足迹评价与核算分析[J]. 中国环境管理,2012(1):21 − 26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6252.2012.01.006
|
| [30] |
张健,张宏亮,谢锦忠,等. 浙江省竹产业发展瓶颈及对策建议[J]. 竹子学报,2019,38(2):11 − 15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6567.2019.02.002
|
| [1] | CHEN Yuanzhen, CHEN Huiting, XU Bing, LU Mei, LI Baofu. Leaf Nutrient Diagnosis of Second Generation Seed Orchard of Pinus massoniana Treated by Different Fertilizers[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2023, 43(4): 42-49. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2023.04.006 |
| [2] | LIU Xi, CHEN Feng, XIE Wen-yuan, MEI Xu-dong, ZHU Hua-min, CHEN Zheng-hai. Notes on the Seed Plant in Zhejiang（ⅩⅦ）[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 42(5): 86-89. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2022.05.012 |
| [3] | YE Jin-jun, QI Ming, ZHANG Zhen, WENG Chun-mei, WANG Hai-rong, CHEN Yi-tai. Comparative Study on Inbreeding Depression of Biclonal and Three-line Seed Orchards of Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 42(4): 1-8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2022.04.001 |
| [4] | WU Ying-qi, YAO Li-wu, WU Li-fang, YE Zeng-xin, YING Guo-hua, HU Kang-hua. Agronomic Characters and Evaluation on Nutritional Quality of Sprouts of Different Chenopodium quinoa Lines[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 41(4): 56-61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2021.04.009 |
| [5] | HU De-sheng, CHEN Li-hua, HU Jun-jing, LEI Yi-chen, LAI Xiang-yan, ZHU Ling, HE Qi-jiang. Effect of Fertilization on Shoot Yield and Quality of Phyllostachys prominens under Soil Covered Cultivation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 41(4): 50-55. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2021.04.008 |
| [6] | LEI Zu-pei, LIU Xi, LIN Li-si, XIE Wen-yuan, MEI Xu-dong, CHEN Zheng-hai. Notes on the Seed Plants in the Northeast Fujian[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 41(3): 74-78. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2021.03.011 |
| [7] | ZHU Jiang-hua, GAN Wei-tao, OU Bin, WANG Jian-hao, LIU Hua-xin. Comparison on Seed Quality of Different Half-sib Families of Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2020, 40(1): 17-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2020.01.003 |
| [8] | ZHANG Xie, XU Qing-qian, GU Yang-chuan, YANG Jian-hua, HUANG Fan. Selection by Open-Pollination Progeny Test of the 2nd Generation Cunnihamia lanceolata Seed Orchard and Their Parent Cone Traits[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 37(4): 1-5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.04.001 |
| [9] | YANG Jun-wen, JIANG Jun-ma, JIA Ning, DONG Lei-ming, DING Yi-wei, HU Chun-yu, TANG Yan-yao, ZENG Yan-ru. Study on Variation in Traits of Seed and Seedling and Their Inheritancein Castanopsis tibetana[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 37(2): 65-71. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.02.010 |
| [10] | XU Cui-xia, TAN Peng-peng, YAN Pan, PENG Fang-ren, CHEN Wen-jing, LI Jian. Traits and Germination Test of Imported Carya illinoinensis Seed[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 36(3): 24-27. |
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: