Advanced Search+
FANG Gui-rong, QIU Yong-bin, XU Jin-liang, JIANG Bo, WU Chu-ping, ZHOU Tian-xiang, SHEN Ai-hua. Growth of Cunninghamia lanceolata Cuttings with Different Clones and Specifications[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 36(2): 68-73.
Citation: FANG Gui-rong, QIU Yong-bin, XU Jin-liang, JIANG Bo, WU Chu-ping, ZHOU Tian-xiang, SHEN Ai-hua. Growth of Cunninghamia lanceolata Cuttings with Different Clones and Specifications[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 36(2): 68-73.
shu

Growth of Cunninghamia lanceolata Cuttings with Different Clones and Specifications

  • 1.

    Kaihua Forest Farm of Zhejiang, Kaihua 324300, China

  • 2.

    Zhejiang Forestry Academy, Hangzhou 310023, China

More Information
  • Received Date: November 20, 2015
  • Revised Date: February 13, 2016
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Afforestation was implemented in 1992 in Kaihua, Zhejiang province, by cuttings of Cunninghamia lanceolata with three different clones and five different seedling specifications. Investigations in 2014 demonstrated that survival and conservation rate of cutting seedlings had no evident difference among clones and specifications, topped to 95% and 85%. Height growth, DBH and individual volume had extremely significant difference among clones, the best clone was Kaitian New 6 with height of 15.56m, DBH of 15.48 cm and individual volume of 0.1598m3. DBH and individual volume had great difference among seedling specifications, the best seedling specification was grade I with height of 14.39m, DBH of 14.34 cm and individual volume of 0.1309m3. Comparisons on growth traits of 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8-year Chinese fir with different seedling specifications demonstrated that height growth, DBH and individual volume reduced difference along with ages among seedling of gradeⅠ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ. Height diameter ratio had no evident difference among clones and specifications, Kaitian 57 had the biggest of 100.64. Crown diameter ratio had significant difference among clones, the lowest was Kaitian New 6 of 14.26. The afforestation and investigation resulted that Kaitian New 6 had the best effect in growth and form traits, could be recommended to plant in medium site conditions of Kaihua country.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (26)
  • [1]
    陈幸良. 林木良种化的经济政策分析[J]. 世界林业研究，2008，21（5）：55-59.
    [2]
    李国雷，刘勇，祝燕，等. 国外苗木质量研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究，2011，24（1）：27-35.
    [3]
    汤文彪. 红豆树苗木分级造林与造林时效的试验[J]. 科技信息，2008（12）：9, 40.
    [4]
    黄英华，于成琦，杜和善，等. 日本落叶松苗木分级造林试验[J]. 吉林林业科技，2003，32（6）：11-13.
    [5]
    吕祥生，杨互友，沈顺海. 池杉、水杉、落羽杉苗木分级造林效果[J]. 江苏林业科技，1993（3）：17-20.
    [6]
    于景利，徐绪双. 红松苗木分级造林10年效果研究[J]. 辽宁林业科技，1989（6）：11-13.
    [7]
    吴中伦. 杉木[M]. 北京：中国林业出版社，1984.
    [8]
    洪菊生，陈伯望. 试论杉木无性系选育策略[J]. 世界林业研究，1993，6（3）：86-91.
    [9]
    王明庥. 论无性系林业——概念和应用[J]. 林业科技开发，1992（1）：2-4.
    [10]
    张晓珊. 杉木优良无性系选择研究[J]. 种子，2007，26（8）：24-26.
    [11]
    齐明. 我国杉木无性系选育的成就、问题和对策[J]. 世界林业研究，2007，20（6）：50-55.
    [12]
    曾志光，肖复明，沈彩周，等. 江西省优质速生杉木无性系选育研究[J]. 林业科学研究，2006，19（5）：561-566.
    [13]
    何贵平，骆文坚，金其祥，等. 杉木无性系主要生长、材质性状遗传差异及无性系选择[J]. 江西农业大学学报，2009，31（1）：91-93.
    [14]
    张孟德. 杉木无性系生长表现和优良无性系选择[J]. 湖南林业科技，2010，37（3）：6-8.
    [15]
    许忠坤. 杉木无性系选择与生长潜力分析[J]. 林业科学研究，2014，27（5）：598-603.
    [16]
    李林. 浙江省开化县林场杉木立木材积表编制方法研究[M]. 北京：北京林业大学，2011.
    [17]
    毛玉明，余土红，方贵荣，等. 杉木无性系苗木分级造林试验初报[J]. 林业科技开发，1997（3）：41-42.
    [18]
    来端，徐金良，余土红，等. 杉木无性系不同规格苗木造林对幼林生长影响的研究[J]. 林业科技通讯，2000（10）：6-7.
    [19]
    周天相，徐金良，余土红，等. 杉木无性系形质指标选育及其效果[J]. 林业利技通讯，1998（5）：6-9.
    [20]
    余荣卓. 杉木二代优良家系不同等级苗造林效果及增产效益[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版），2010，34（1）：129-131.
    [21]
    张远华，吴兵，沈云. 桉树不同级别扦插苗造林试验[J]. 广西林业科学，2008，37（1）：31-34.
    [22]
    蒋炳洪. 浦城县杉木实生苗造林成活率试验[J]. 福建林业科技，2014，41（3）：139-141.
    [23]
    段爱国，张雄清，张建国，等. 21年生杉木无性系生长与遗传评价[J]. 林业科学研究，2014，27（5）：672-676.
    [24]
    陈清堤. 杉木无性系造林对比试验及重复力估测[J]. 林业调查规划，2010，35（6）：140-144.
    [25]
    李林源，连华萍，许鲁平. 杉木种子园良种与优良无性系造林试验[J]. 林业科技开发，2015，29（1）：30-32.
    [26]
    马常耕，周天相，徐金良. 杉木无性系的遗传控制和早期选择初探[J]. 林业科学，2000，36（1）：62-69.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Yong, LU Youyou, WANG Zhigao, WU Chuping, YAO Liangjin, JIAO Jiejie, LI Lanying, WANG Zeng. Effect of Species Diversity and Stand Structure on the Biomass of Arbor Layer in Forest Dominated by Quercus glauca[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2024, 44(6): 16-20. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.06.003
    [2]CAO Yi-lin, WU Da-sheng, FANG Lu-ming. Estimation of Forest Aboveground Biomass in Linhai based on Sentinel Data[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 42(5): 40-49. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2022.05.006
    [3]FENG Hong-neng, YANG De-hong, SHEN Cong-ying. Prediction of Distribution of Alcimandra cathcartii in Yunnan Province based on Maximum Entropy Modeling[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 41(3): 46-50. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2021.03.006
    [4]LI Na, LI Qing-shun, LI Hong-tao. Study on Carbon Reserve and Sequestration of Forest in Qinghai Area of Qilian Mountain National Park[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 41(2): 41-46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2021.02.007
    [5]LI Han, WANG Xia, MENG Jing-hui. Dynamic Changes of Carbon Stocks of Arbors in Experimental Center in Guangxi[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 39(2): 29-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2019.02.005
    [6]WEN Li-na, YE Chang-fei, LIU Jian-ling, HUA Mei-xia, MAO Qing-qing, JIANG Bo. Regularity of Distribution of Biomass and Moisture Content in Different Organs ofContainer Ormosia hosiei Seedlings[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2018, 38(4): 38-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2018.04.006
    [7]SUN Yan-fei, WANG Guo-ying, HOU Jian-hua, MO Lu-feng. Biomass Estimation Model and Its Universality of Cunninghamia lanceolata in Lin’an[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2018, 38(2): 50-56. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2018.02.008
    [8]LU Chao, SHEN Jian-jun, WANG Xiu-yun, ZHU Tang-jun. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Biomass of Green Space in the City Proper of Wenzhou[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 37(4): 18-23. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.04.004
    [9]ZHANG Jun, GE Ying, GAO Zhi-hui, WU Chu-ping, HUANG Yu-jie, JIAO Jie-jie, JIANG Bo, CHANG Jie. Simulation and Sensitivity for Biomass ofFour Main Forest Types in Zhejiang Using TRIPLEX Model[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2015, 35(6): 1-8.
    [10]CHEN Shu-rong, ZHANG Chao, ZHENG Chao-chao, ZHANG Wei, YI Li-ta, YU Shu-quan. Estimation Methods for Biomass of Ecological Forest in Jinyun[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2015, 35(5): 20-28.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (465) PDF downloads (212) Cited by(2)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles
    Copyright © Editorial department of Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology
    Address：Hangzhou left the editorial department of Zhejiang Academy of ForestryPostal Code：310023Tel：0571-87798221

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return