Advanced Search+
ZHAO Ying, WANG Guo-ming, CHEN Wen, ZHANG Ling, GAO Hao-jie, QIU Hai-sheng. Effect of Salt-mist Stress on Physiological Properties of Seven Native Tree Species in Zhoushan[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 36(1): 24-31.
Citation: ZHAO Ying, WANG Guo-ming, CHEN Wen, ZHANG Ling, GAO Hao-jie, QIU Hai-sheng. Effect of Salt-mist Stress on Physiological Properties of Seven Native Tree Species in Zhoushan[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 36(1): 24-31.

Effect of Salt-mist Stress on Physiological Properties of Seven Native Tree Species in Zhoushan

More Information
  • Received Date: June 27, 2015
  • Revised Date: September 11, 2015
  • Experiments were implemented in November of 2012 on the container seedlings of Cinnamomum japonicum var. chenii, Neolitsea sericea, Machilus thunbergii, Ilex integra, Lithocarpus glaber, Raphiolepis umbellate and Eurya emarginata sprayed by 18‰ salt-mist with 0, 0.5, 1 and 2 hours a day for 35 days. Determinations were conducted on free proline and chlorophyll content and relative electrical conductivity of treated seedling leaves. The result showed that along with duration of stress, proline content of M. thunbergii, C. japonicum var. chenii, E. emarginata, N. sericea and L. glaber increased first, and then decreased, while that of I. integra, R. umbellata changed little. Chlorophyll content of treated seedlings topped at the middle stage of the treatment. By the end of the experiment, chlorophyll content of R. umbellata increased significantly, that of N. sericea changed little, that of L. glaber and M. thunbergii decreased, that of the left species had no evident regular changes. Relative electricity conductivity of I. integra and R. umbellata had little increase, and that of left tree species had great increase, and topped in the last day of treatment.
  • [1]
    孙海菁,王树凤,陈益泰. 盐胁迫对6个树种的生长及生理指标的影响[J]. 林业科学研究,2009,22(3):315-324.
    [2]
    杨升,张华新,张丽. 植物耐盐生理生化指标及耐盐植物筛选综述[J]. 西北林学院学报,2010,25(3):59-65.
    [3]
    杨升,刘正祥,张华新,等. 3个树种苗期耐盐性综合评价及指标筛选[J]. 林业科学,2013,49(1):91-98.
    [4]
    张露婷,吴江,梅丽,等. 喜树种源耐盐能力评价及耐盐指标筛选[J]. 林业科学,2011,47(11):66-72.
    [5]
    张华新,宋丹,刘正祥. 盐胁迫下11个树种生理特性及其耐盐性研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2008,21(2):168-175.
    [6]
    Draaijers G P J,Van Ek R,Bleuten W. Atmospheric deposition in complex forest landscapes[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology,1994,69(4):343-366.
    [7]
    薄井五郎. 海风环境下におけゐ天然生树木の生态と砂防的应用[J]. 北海道试验场研究报告,1990(28):16-19.
    [8]
    张忠辉,林士杰,吕忠明,等. 树木耐盐碱性研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报,2011,27(28):9-14.
    [9]
    陈顺伟,高智慧,岳春雷,等. 杜英等树种对盐雾胁迫的反应及其生理特性研究[J]. 浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2001,27(4):398-402.
    [10]
    陈顺伟,高智慧,岳春雷,等. 盐雾胁迫下杜英等树种生理特性的变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2003,27(5):11-14.
    [11]
    刘祖祺. 植物抗性生理学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,1993.
    [12]
    吕芝香,王正刚. 盐胁迫下小麦苗叶片吡咯-5-羧酸还原酶活性和游离脯氨酸积累[J]. 植物生理学报,1993,19(2):111-116
    [13]
    黄承玲,陈训,高贵龙. 3种高山杜鹃对持续干旱的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 林业科学,2011,47(6):48-55.
    [14]
    Blum A,Ebercon A. Genotypic responses in sorghum to drought stress. III. Free proline accumulation and drought resistance[J]. Crop Sci, 1976,16(3):428-431.
    [15]
    Singh T N,Aspinall D,Paleg L G. Proline accumulation and varietal adaptability to drought in barley: a potential metabolic measure of drought resistance[J]. Nature: New biology,1972(236):188-190.
    [16]
    Haro R,Baneulos M A,Quintero F J,et al. Genetic basis of sodium exclusion and sodium tolerance in yeast.A model for plants [J]. Physiol Plant,2006,89(4):868-874.
    [17]
    Petrusa L M,Winicov I. Proline status in salt tolerant and salt sensitive alfalfa cell lines and plants in response to NaCl [J]. Plant Physiol Biochem,1997,35(4):303-310.
    [18]
    Soussi M,Ocana A,Lluch C. Effects of salt stress on growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation in chick-pea (Cicer arietinum L.)[J]. J Exp Bot,1998,49(325):1329-1337.
    [19]
    Sanada Y,Ueda H,Kuribayashi K,et al. Novel light-dark change of proline levels in halophyte (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L.) and glycophytes (Hordeum vulgare L. and Triticum aestivum L.) leaves and roots under salt stress [J]. Plant Cell Physiol,1995,36(6):965-970.
    [20]
    Santa-Cruz A,Acosta M,Rus A,et al. Short-term salt tolerance mechanisms in differentially salt tolerant tomato species [J]. Plant Physiol Biochem,1999,37(1):65-71.
    [21]
    郭艳茹,詹亚光. 植物耐盐性生理生化指标的综合评价[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,2006,(1):66-70.
    [22]
    杨帆,丁菲,杜天真. 土壤盐胁迫对构树幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2008,30(4):684-688.
    [23]
    王臣,虞木奎,王宗星,等. 9个楸树无性系对盐胁迫的差异响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(2) :20-24.
    [24]
    夏阳,孙明高,李国雷,等. 盐胁迫对四园林绿化树种叶片中叶绿素含量动态变化的影响[J]. 山东农业大学学报:自然科学版,2005,36(1):30-34.
    [25]
    董晓霞,赵树慧,孔令安. 苇状羊茅盐胁迫下生理效应的研究[J]. 草业科学,1998,15(5):10-13.
    [26]
    王利军,马履一,王爽,等. 水盐胁迫对沙枣幼苗叶绿素荧光参数和色素含量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报,2010(12):122-127.
    [27]
    杨传平,焦喜才,刘文祥等. 树木的细胞膜透性与抗盐性[J]. 东北林业大学学报,1997,25(1):1-3.
  • Related Articles

    [1]FANG Yanjie, ZHANG Huainan, SHANG Tianqi, YANG Shaoqin, XU Tianle. Evaluation, Protection and Utilization of Forest Landscape Resources in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2024, 44(6): 105-112. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.06.014
    [2]LUO Yibo, MAO Wei, JI Biyong. History and Prospect of Forest Resources Survey and Monitoring in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2024, 44(5): 140-146. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.05.018
    [3]ZHANG Huainan, LIU Jinlin, LI Min, SHANG Tianqi, XU Da. Research on Forest Tourist Behavior in Zhejiang Province Based on Mobile Communication Big Data[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2024, 44(4): 68-75. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2024.04.011
    [4]DAI Jinsong, JI Biyong, XU Da, TAO Jixing. Research on Model Groups for Annual Standing Volume Growth in Zhejiang[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2023, 43(5): 51-58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2023.05.007
    [5]HU Wei-jiang, JIANG Zhong-long, BI Ya-ying, QIN Mei, ZHANG Yi, LIN Hai-ping, LIU Hai-ying. Current Situation and Countermeasures of Nature Education in State-owned Forest Farms in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 42(2): 100-106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2022.02.017
    [6]LU Jin-bao, SHAO Hua-liang, JIN Xin, WANG Shao-ping, WANG Jian-wu, XIE Bing-lou, WU Wei-zhi. A Comparative Study on Arboreal Forest Durability in The Eastern and Western Zhejiang Province within 25 Years[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2022, 42(2): 48-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2022.02.008
    [7]WANG Jian-wu, WU Wei-zhi, ZHU Cheng-hao, WENG Wei-song. On Relevant Interest Rate by Evaluation of Forest Resources Assets in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2020, 40(5): 21-27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2020.05.004
    [8]JIA Hui, YANG Liu, ZHENG Jing-biao. Advances of UAV Remote Sensing Applied in Forest Resources Investigation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2018, 38(4): 89-97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2018.04.015
    [9]ZHAO Xiao-guang, ZHAO Jia-huan. Spatial Panel Analysis on Factors Influencing Forestry Economic Development in Key State-owned Forested Areas in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 37(5): 54-60. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.05.009
    [10]WANG Jian-wu. Technical Characteristics and Discussion on the Latest Forest Management Inventory in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 37(4): 95-99. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2017.04.017

Catalog

    Article views (429) PDF downloads (234) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return